All-cause mortality is the most reliable data available to scientists.

Why?

Because deaths can be neither hidden nor manipulated. It’s binary. One or zero. Either he died or he didn’t.

And the cool part about all-cause mortality is that it can be split across a few uncompromising data points like

• age,
• location and
• gender.

Meanwhile, making claims about the cause of death quickly becomes complicated due to (lack of) supporting evidence and other epistemological challenges.

All-cause mortality is simple

For example, if Mike told me that Jenny died from Covid, then my response might be “how do you know?” At which point, Mike is compelled to provide supporting evidence. If he responds with something like “the doctor said so”, then my response might be “how does the doctor know?”.

Funeral Director and embalmer Laura Jeffery recently testified at the National Citizens Inquiry in Toronto, Ontario.

Jeffery detailed aspects of her profession as a basic method of ensuring that people who have died were well-represented in their appearance.

Embalmers use a technique that drains the circulatory system of deceased patients and fills it with preservation so “that we can present a person that is reasonable to how their appearance should be,” said Jeffery.

“I started to notice anomalies to what the return was – the return blood was stickier, thicker, darker and I started seeing little tiny pieces of clot like polka dots coming out… there was something different. I would call it ‘dirty blood.’”

Jeffrey had a routine that she followed to conduct her work, which was interrupted shortly after the roll out of the gene therapy injections, known as COVID-19 vaccines, when she began discovering white fibrous masses in the veins of the deceased people in her care.

“It’s an anomaly that I have never seen before in 27 years as an embalmer and funeral director. I started seeing them in the Spring of 2021,” Jeffery said.

“The fibre mass clots are solid. They are an exact cast of what the circulatory system looks like inside of our bodies and they often have a current jelly clot incorporated into the tentacles of the white fibre masses so it almost seems as though the masses are feeding off of our blood,” Jeffery continued, referring to the findings as appearing more parasitic than clot-like.

‘Will the parents or guardians of the deceased please step forward?’ wrote Sasha Latypova. ‘We have the murder weapon and the smoking gun evidence of what killed your children.’

A new study reveals that a large “mega-batch” of Pfizer gene-based COVID injectable product “targeted at children” has killed two ten-year-old boys and injured at least 1,264 youngsters.

A March 31 report by Sasha Latypova — a former pharmaceutical executive turned researcher — highlighted a study performed by Medicinal Genomics (MG) that discovered and documented DNA contamination in Pfizer “mega-batch” number FL8095, which was marketed to children between the ages of 5 and 11.

MG’s chief science officer Kevin McKernan reported their findings, describing that the study was limited to surveying eight pictured vials of the product which came from the same case as well. Yet their sequencing analysis found each vial failed European Medicines Agency “specification of 3030:1 RNA:DNA,” to the extent they are “over the limit by an order of magnitude (18-70 fold).”

“The DNA contamination is very consistent and the vial to vial ratio of RNA:DNA is very consistent” among the vials, McKernan wrote.

Latypova explains that such “DNA is a process-related impurity which comes from growing DNA in plasmids in ecoli bacteria as the first step of manufacturing. The DNA then gets converted into modified RNA via in-vitro transcription. Sort of. A bunch of it does not get removed completely and ends up all the way through in the final product.”

“Since large amounts of DNA end up in the final product in vials, it is highly likely that many other contaminants are there, including ecoli, endotoxins, and any other extraneous materials and chemicals used along the way,” she explained.

In the featured video, which aired June 22, 2021, independent reporter Stew Peters plays an audio recording1 made by a young woman who suddenly developed Guillain-Barre syndrome after her Moderna injection. Her neurologist believes her condition is the direct result of the COVID shot.

While the neurologist filed an adverse event report with the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), the woman decided to report it to Moderna as well. The Moderna rep does not appear the least surprised by the injury, and appears to admit he’s received similar reports before.

Everyone Who Gets the Jab Is Part of the Safety Trial

During that call, the Moderna representative reads her the following disclaimer:

“The Moderna COVID-19 vaccine has not been approved or licensed by the Food and Drug Administration, but it has been authorized for emergency use by the FDA under an emergency use authorization to prevent coronavirus disease 2019, for use in individuals 18 years of age and older.

There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19. The EUA for the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine is in effect for the duration of the COVID-19 EUA declaration, justifying emergency use of the product unless that declaration is terminated or the authorization is revoked sooner.”

The rep also points out that all clinical trial phases are still ongoing, and that long-term protective efficacy against COVID-19 is unknown. When the patient asks whether everyone who gets the COVID shot — even if they did not specifically sign up to be a trial participant — is in fact part of the clinical trial, he replies, with a chuckle, “pretty much, yeah.”

So, in a nutshell, while vaccine makers, health authorities, mainstream media, social media platforms like Facebook and public advertisements tell you the vaccine has undergone rigorous testing, has been “approved” and is safe and effective, none of those claims are true.

An expert in public finance and policy evaluation at Michigan State University, Economics Professor Mark Skidmore revealed in a recent study that the CV19 bioweapon vax was debilitating and deadly from the very beginning.  His troubles began when the study he conducted showed nearly 300,000 CV19 vax deaths in just the first year of injections.   The report went viral, and it was a top trending study on social media that 17 million people read.  Dr. Skidmore has published dozens of peer-reviewed scientific papers, but this peer-reviewed study is now being retracted by a top scientific publication.  On top of that, Dr. Skidmore is being investigated academically for essentially telling the truth about the deadly CV19 vax.  Dr. Skidmore says, “I have never had anything happen like this in my career.  I have published more than 80 peer-reviewed papers and never had a retraction or anything like this.  Peer review is rigorous.  An editor (at BMC Infectious Diseases) made a decision to publish, and she was courageous.  She had to have known this had potential to cause controversy, and it has.  That’s okay.  There are people attacking me personally, and attacking the integrity of the process and my integrity.  They are challenging the methods. . . . I asked about Covid illness issues, and there was not one inquiry about that.  But, if I asked about Covid vaccine issues, it’s just the questions about that, and was it legitimate?”

The paper was scientifically peer reviewed and published in late January 2023.  Now, for some unknown reason, BMC Infectious Diseases has recently retracted Dr. Skidmore’s study that showed a huge number of deaths that proved the CV19 vax program was an obvious global disaster from the very beginning.  (Dr. Skidmore refutes the retraction here.)  Did Dr. Skidmore get it right, or is his study dramatically flawed?  Dr. Skidmore points out, “Right now, you can go on the CDC website, and you will learn that the federal government and the CDC has acknowledged a total of nine fatalities from the Covid vaccines—nine.  I have, what I think, is a rough estimate of 280,000 (deaths from the CV19 bioweapon/vax in 2021).  One of my mentors in graduate school said it is better to be generally correct than precisely incorrect.  I think I am generally correct.  Nine is very precise.  I think I am a lot closer to being right than the CDC.”

5G networks are being deployed on a major scale, despite a lack of safety testing and a growing body of evidence suggesting harm. Action Alert!

A new study from top scientists and medical researchers concludes that there is “substantial scientific evidence” that radiofrequency (RF) radiation causes cancer, endocrine and neurological problems, and many other negative health effects. These are crucial findings given the exponential increase in human exposure to RF radiation through increased cell phone use but more importantly the deployment of 5G networks that will require our cities and towns to become inundated with “small cell” towers, saturating our neighborhoods with RF radiation. Current safety standards are completely inadequate to protect Americans, but Congress and federal regulators are too beholden to the interests of the telecoms industry to care.

The researchers apply a modified version of Koch’s postulates to determine if RF radiation causes cancer. (Koch’s postulates were developed in the 19th century to assess whether a microorganism causes a disease.) Using this model, the authors concluded that there is a “plethora of both experimental and epidemiological evidence establishing a causal relationship between EMF and cancer and other adverse health effects including adverse effects on fetal development and the endocrine system.”

In 2015, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention labeled community water fluoridation as one of the 10 greatest public health achievements of the 20th century.1 To this day, relatively few consumers are aware of water fluoridation’s sordid history or the battle that’s been going on behind the scenes to get this toxin out of U.S. drinking water.

I’ve been warning of the risks for well over a decade and have been ridiculed as a result. In one example from 2013, an article published by mainstream media outlet Slate scoffed at the idea of fluoride as a neurotoxin, insulting me directly in the process.2

Vindication is upon us, however, following the court-ordered release of the National Toxicology Program’s (NTP) systematic review of fluoride’s neurotoxicity — a release that was blocked by government officials and concealed from the public since May 2022.3

RELATED

Harvard Study Confirms Fluoride Reduces Children’s IQ

A staggering 1 in 6 Americans of childbearing age are infertile according to a shocking World Health Organization report.

The revelation also confirms that much of the Western World struggles with plummeting fertility rates as birth rates fall woefully below the level of replacement.

The WHO report underscored ‘sheer proportion’ of those affected highlighted the need to make fertility treatments more widely available.

The report defined infertility as failure to conceive after 12 months of regular unprotected sex.

Although the West’s infertility rates caused concern, areas of the Pacific registered higher infertility rates with 23.2% lifetime infertility rates.

The Middle East and Eastern Mediterrean zone was found to have had almost half the level of infertility as the West, while Subsaharan Africa’s infertility rates clocked in at around two-thirds of the Americas.

The Daily Mail reported:

“While the WHO estimates one in six adults globally will be affected by infertility in their life time there are regional variations. The Easter Mediterranean recorded the lowest infertility rare of just 10.7 per cent, followed by Africa with 13.1 per cent and then Europe with 16.5 per cent. The Western pacific region recorded the highest rate of 23.2 per cent, followed by the Americas with 20 per cent. No figure was available for the South East Asia region due to lack of quality studies in that area.”

There is much conjecture surrounding the causes of high infertility rates, including obesity.

Most people are shocked to learn the human body has 724 trillion cells.  Of those tiny structures, blood cells are crucial.  Evidence now reveals that the COVID-19 shot transmits a substance similar to graphene, eliminating essential blood cells.

Though the human body replaces its cells once every seven years, physicians and scientists are concerned that the coronavirus shots cause lasting damage and even sudden death.

Doctor claims COVID shot causes cellular damage and blood clots in uninjected due to shedding of graphene-like substance

Doctors have proven that the COVID injection is shedding a substance similar to graphene, ultimately compromising cellular structure, forming unexpected blood clots, and causing premature death.  One of those doctors, Dr. Philippe van Welbergen, has demonstrated how the shot’s graphene expands into sizable fibers and other structures, developing magnetism and, in some cases, electrical charges.

The evidence was set forth in a series of blood samples derived from injected and uninjected populations.  When further analyzed, the structures reveal unexpected complexity, including striations, meaning diminutive lines or scratches similar to those on the surfaces of rocks.  The result is damage to the body’s essential blood cells.

Dr. Philippe first demonstrated his heroic irreverence for convention in the summer of 2021 when he gave a painfully honest interview on South Africa’s Loving Life TV.  During this interview, the physician explained how his patients endured cognitive challenges, chronic fatigue, and vertigo after receiving Big Pharma’s injection.

Several members of Congress are trying to get answers from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) about a researcher there who is tampering with multiple different strains of monkeypox in order to produce a super-monkeypox virus that is 1,000 times more deadly than the last one.

House Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wa.), Subcommittee on Health Chair Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.), and Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Chair Morgan Griffith (R-Va.) recently sent a second letter to Lawrence Tabak, a senior official at the NIH who is currently performing the duties of director, requesting details about the project. They sent an initial letter back on Oct. 31, 2022, but never received any response.

In this second letter, the three members of Congress also included a formal notice asking the NIH to preserve all existing and future records and materials related to the new monkeypox project so it can be reviewed and scrutinized at some point in the future.

(Related: Remember when public health officials were caught lying about the last monkeypox scare?)

Why is the government once again tampering with deadly bioweapons – and using YOUR tax dollars to do it?

Regulators from the US Department of Agriculture are now deciding how to label meat ‘cultivated’ in a laboratory for public sale and inspect facilities that produce it. The guidelines are expected sometime this year — a final hurdle before the products can hit store shelves. Cultivated, or cultured-cell, meat is grown in energy intensive steel bioreactors from animal stem cells that are fed a mixture of vitamins, fats, sugars and oxygen. The process results in real meat tissue without having to raise or slaughter an animal.

The US Food and Drug Administration has given a safety clearance to lab-grown meat for the first time in November 2022. CNN reported that Upside Foods, a California company, gained approval for its product after the agency said it had evaluated the information submitted by Upside and it had “no further questions at this time about the firm’s safety conclusion.” It appears there was no independent testing.

Good Meat was also approved by the FDA without questions.

Upside has attracted hing-profile financing from Bill Gates, Richard Branson and Whole Foods founder John Mackey. UPSIDE says it can produce 50,000 pounds of cultivated chicken a year using current technology in its $50-million facility. Valeti said Upside will need significant additional investment to scale up to 400,000 pounds a year — but that’s the goal.

RELATED

Lab-made chicken meat grown from CANCER CELLS receives FDA approval – are you ready to eat TUMOR nuggets?